The link in the comments

The post talks about a resource whose address appears nowhere in its text. The link waits in the first comment, where it does not penalize distribution.

FamilyIntent
Position in the postLast line, then first comment
What it is afterDistribution first, the click second
Misleading?Not in itself
In one sentence

The link has not disappeared, it has moved: the post keeps its reach, and you make the trip.

01 · If you use it

What holds, and what does not

The technique itself is neutral. What changes is the gap between what the line promises and what the post delivers.

Defensible

If you write, say precisely where the link leads: the title of the resource, the site, what can be found there.

If you move the link to a comment, say why, in one sentence, without presenting the detour as a service.

If the post relies on an external resource, make sure it teaches something even to those who will not click.

To avoid

Do not announce a link in the comments that you will publish hours later, or never.

Do not present working around the platform as a favor to the reader.

Do not empty the post of its content to force the trip through the link.

02 · How to recognise it

Three markers

01

The signal phrase

"Link in the comments", "it's just below", "in the first comment". A fixed formula replaces the address, to the point of having become a convention of the feed.

02

The body of the post is a dead end

No address, no domain name, sometimes not even the exact title of the resource. The whole text talks about it, nothing leads to it.

03

The first comment belongs to the author

Published within the minute, often pinned, sometimes topped up with a reminder. The post and its comment form a single two-story device.

03 · Annotated examples

The same mechanism, three forms

BARE FORMULA

« The link is in the first comment. »

The sentence closes the post like a signature. It assumes the reader knows the rules of the game: the click requires a detour.

Why isn't the link in the post?
RULE INVOKED

« I'm not putting the link here, LinkedIn doesn't like that. It's just below. »

The author explains the maneuver while performing it. The platform's constraint becomes an argument of complicity with the reader.

Is the explanation given the real reason for the detour?
DEFERRED RESOURCE

« I detailed everything in the article. You know where to find it. »

The post summarizes, the article develops, the comment connects. Each story keeps the reader on the post a little longer.

Did the post alone teach you anything, or does everything point to the article?
04 · Why it works

The mechanism

The platform has an interest in keeping its users at home. A post containing an external link is shown less than one without, because it organizes the exit. Moving the link to a comment works around that treatment: the post circulates as a self-contained text.

The detour produces a second effect: to find the link, the reader opens the comments. That opening, the time spent, and the possible click on the author's comment are all signals counted in the post's favor.

The phrase "link in the comments" has become so common that it works as a shared code. The regular reader no longer questions the detour; they execute it. That is the sign of an established technique: it no longer hides, it names itself.

05 · What to check

Four questions

A link moved aside to avoid throttling distribution.

Is the promised link actually in the comments?

Under some posts, the announced comment does not exist or arrives hours later. The referral then served to get the comments opened, nothing more.

Does the post stand without the link?

If the text delivers the essentials and the link goes deeper, the detour is a light toll. If the text is only a trailer, the value sits entirely behind the detour.

Where does the link lead?

An article, a tool, a sign-up, a sales page: the destination says whether the device serves the reader or the prospecting.

Is the detour owned or dressed up?

"LinkedIn doesn't like links" is an honest explanation of the maneuver. "To make your reading easier" is not: the link in the post would be simpler.

Put the link where you would go and read it yourself.

Three whole posts a month, no credit card.